Understanding the history of man in itself we know that the reliability of humans to maintain a pure construct of the things done and seen has often been weakened by various factors.
Whether you choose to accept each ideological, philosophical, and theological theory is up to you. Acceptance being a key part of how your view of history is painted. Often humans tend to accept what is most feasible to their thoughts/views, choosing to allow their reality and history to be created for them instead of challenging it. With the evolution of man through each time period a rift begins to grow between those stagnant in time and those that ascension allows to see behind the veils of “history”, “life”, and even “death”. That same evolution forces you to advance or leads to becoming lost in the many distractions that come as offspring of each generation. Understand that history is being created by every moment in time, your present is the past for the future. Just as the accounts of your life will either be documented by others to tell or by the source to give as a recollection so will history. History can only be a mass collection of events in time as given from the perspective of those that were there as witnesses and from the opinions of those in the present looking to clarify past events. Would that in turn mean that we are "history" living out itself, inside of itself, telling of itself? From this view would only those truthfully narrating it and causing effective changes in it truly be apart of it? Would that make everything opposite of the truth a pre meditated anomaly to cause truth to press itself out more vigorously than before? If every thing works out as it is meant to be are the moments in history already planned courses ? Does this deem any of the previous assumptions as to who we are factual? Only if you accept it as such.
0 Comments
History “His story” is an account of the past or everything before the present as man has documented it, through the actions and eyes of man.
A collection of memories from man and woman documented in an attempt to clarify who we are and who we’ve been. History changes often with each coming perspective given that deems itself worthy enough to be applied and more so by those that choose to accept it. If the events in your life were told by every person witnessing it as it happened do you think every verbal or written account from each individual would be the same? Would the accuracy of it be based upon facts or opinions from each individual? Would there be pieces that were missing or extra pieces being added? If it is your history wouldn't the only reliable source from perspective’s respective standpoint be you? For example the game "Chinese Whispers" or "Telephone" that begins when a player whispers a statement into the ear of another player and it gets passed on to the next player until it reaches the last individual, the beginning statement has often been butchered into something else that doesn’t resemble the beginning players' original statement. If viewed in this manner then does there stand any true reliability in the accounts given by others? Must there be a direct correlation between the source(s) and the informant? Must the informant be non-biased and able to give from the source(s) in a manner that cannot be deemed as tampered with? How would you define a "healthy relationship"? Is it one where both partners essential needs are met? Is it one where there is enough pleasure to keep you both satisfied? Is it one where there is a deep connection between each other's emotional principals? Could it be one where there is consistent communication with a mutual want for understanding and compromise? A relationship in itself being a joint effort that requires constant maintenance and repair from the damage caused not only from each other but also from the outside elements that intrude upon your growth together. Unless you're under the illusion that any one of these things doesn't matter then you recognize that each one of these are key elements to the "healthy relationship". These things don't implement themselves into a relationship overnight but with commitment and willingness for better, they gradually become part of your foundation. The essential needs of you and your partner being met are necessary of course with those needs often varying with the progression of time. The variation of these needs shouldn't be seen as an obstacle but more as an opportunity for growth between both of you eventually becoming building blocks for stability. Pleasure comes in various forms in a relationship with the possibility of them ranging from:
You not only begin to learn more about your partner but you learn more about yourself and how much you're willing to do for them. Working on gaining a better interrelation between each other's emotions builds a bridge of understanding, one that can withstand external pressures and changes that naturally occur. Consistently creating links between the emotions that flow inward and are expressed outward with your partner allows you to each gain a better sense of trust with each other that becomes cohesive with your understanding for one another. Communication cannot be compromised in a relationship but with good communication, you'll learn compromise. It takes a balance of giving and receiving a sort of dance that you both begin to better yourselves at as you work towards establishing common grounds with each other. Each of these factors complements the foundation of a stable and "healthy relationship" something that isn't found but worked towards. Beautiful when built but often complex in the process of building it, time-consuming but worth the time put in. |
|